United States v. John Apel ( 2014 )

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50003
Plaintiff-Appellee,
D.C. No.
v. 2:10-cr-00830-
JFW-1
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50004
Plaintiff-Appellee,
D.C. No.
v. 2:10-cr-00869-
JFW-1
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50005
Plaintiff-Appellee,
D.C. No.
v. 2:10-cr-00831-
JFW-1
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
2 UNITED STATES V. APEL
Filed August 14, 2014
Before: Barry G. Silverman and Johnnie B. Rawlinson,
Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.*
Per Curiam Opinion
COUNSEL
Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew
Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California,
Irvine School of Law, for Defendant-Appellant.
André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale
and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), Assistant United States
Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
On February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court
vacated our opinion at 676 F.3d 1202 and remanded the case
to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.
United States v. Apel, __ U.S. __, 134 S. Ct. 1144 (2014).
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.